頻率不對, 理念不合, 怎麼管理?

我覺得不需要強湊在一起, 要共事,也要設計降低磨擦力的作法.

管理風格不同, 就應該把自己的管理原則說清楚, 寫明白, 很多主管是不會講, 沒時間,不知道如何表達自己的管理方式, 只知道要別人Follow,但又說不清楚講不明白怎麼follow, 靠揣摩是管不好團隊的.

有人喜歡用說的,有人喜歡用寫的, 把這些行事風格找出來理清楚, 最佳化調整.

很多管理風格也是要掩飾主管的無知, 掩蓋主管能力不及的地方.

頻率不對, 可以調職務, 換位置,

但我覺得還是要降低工作上的相依性,提高偶合性,獨立性,

用工作績效反應工作成果.

再者應該也要看看創辦人的理念價值, 主事者的人格特質,誠信度, 他的之世界觀與知識結構,

人無德, 長期共事太痛苦.

這樣的委屈在職場上比比皆是,  人資其實可以幫企業作的事很多, 真正有心 ,可以解決很多問題.

 

廣告

如何升遷

MaxthonSnap20180719065335

這圖合理.

也用這標準評估企業是否大致以這樣的思維作人事安排? Political connection, 言淺意深.很多企業文化, 很難 connection, 慢慢體會吧

業務是職務還是人格特質?

業務員的特質是什麼?

一種天生的特質

對客戶的同理心"的個性,能克服客戶購買前的猶豫不決

一種“介於同理心和自我驅動之間的動態狀態"

有時處處為客戶著想, 解決問題有時又非常主動,自動自發,找客戶,找出客戶的問題

兩種特質互相強化,也互相平衡.

業務員具有內在的人際關係感.
這種特質比較隱性, 看不太出來.

“對客戶的需求和反應有感覺"

人就是個性,行為,態度, 能力的交互影響.

如果把業務定義為一種職位, 但卻沒有這樣同理心的軟性人格特質, 結果會如何?

人格特質測驗, 看看有沒有這樣的"個性傾向或興趣", 而不是能力.

有這種特質,往業務方向發展會比較順利. “能感覺別人"是一種特質

雖不同領域的業務, 專業知識皆不同,

但這種傑出業務的人格特質是相同.

Communication problem in corporation

By John Brooks Business Adventures

It’s very interesting business book.

On Chap.7, it mentions about the communication problem in General Electric.

It’s complicated on communication in corporation.

It is very difficult to move the thinking in one’s brain to other people’s. It’s very difficult to make every members to truly understand.

No matter individual or organization, they are all very difficult to express themselves. People can not understand what they talk.

Does company’s real attitude reflect the true attitude of the CEO?

It’s interesting. I also wondered sometimes.

They are all true, but “at different frequency level".

How can I believe you are not joking?

It’s lacking “a form of mutual comprehension for mutual communication".

The problem is also between individual and self.
It is necessary to communication with self successfully firstly, then communicate with other people.

The problem is " the uncertainty of expression", which needs to be avoided in corporation.

It really reflects the problem on corporate communication.
As CEO say NO, we are not sure if he truly and firmly say no, or say no but yes in mind.

This book, recommended by Bill Gates, is very practical and insightful in business world.

The four rules of a project manager

MaxthonSnap20170416115154

Modern data scientist

MaxthonSnap20170415132054

It’s interesting and reasonable

The employee engagement scorecard

MaxthonSnap20170414182538

這張員工承諾計分卡很有用,  這表告訴員工, 企業的期待,也可以這標準對員工評分,  讓人心服口服. 勞資之間的溝通因為這張表而清晰有標準.

常讀學界的一手管理資訊是有幫助的,  業界至少知道這些最新,最好的管理方法或技術發展, 佈置無所適從.

知識並非遙不可及, 關鍵是意願,

用對管理管理與方法, 適當導入. 好工具,

從這表的問題也可看出對工作的定義是否清楚,

太多台灣企業工作定義模糊化, 結果可想而知.

Hacker Approach

A good approach for innovation, either

MaxthonSnap20170324063855

I think it is useful as to be an expert but require to think deeply on each element, not just reading words on surface.  In western culture, no one use exam to demonstrate capability.  They adapt " experimental" , to gain the know-how for domain knowledge and using the know-how. They try. They gain from experience. They gain by action until efficiency. They observed. They ask, They persist, They solve problem, They adapt, They focus on result, They plan. They analysis.

 

Data and skills sets

MaxthonSnap20170322101911

Key assets for a multistage life

MaxthonSnap20170322094906

 

%d 位部落客按了讚: